Dust Bowl :: essays research papers

body BowlWhen a dust bowl hits ground its like nightfalls in seconds. You could not experience this figure of feeling any where in less you were there at that moment. People were frantic. They thought it was the end of the world as they new it. People were coming deck with mysterious illness. Both men, women and children were not sure if they would live the next day. This was the wrong time at the wrong place. Nobody could have known that this would have happened at this time. It was an act of god, people thought. They thought he was mad because farmers were plowing up the fields and steering up dust. In 1931 the best place in the unify States to be a farmer was the Great Plains. Farmers were promoting the southwest, (Taxes) saying that when one would plow the dirt it looked like a sea of choc let, when they did not know of the endless drought that was ahead. In the 1920s the tractor was invented to speed up the process of plowing. A horse could plow two to three acres a day. A tractor could plow fifty dollar bill acres a day. That was a huge difference in a farms life style. He had more time to spend with family and to get other chores done. clay would build up in the air but the rain was not falling. Breathing became difficult because dust was hitting nose, eyes, and mouth. Kids had to start warring dust masks to school. It was a requirement by the Red Cross. After a dust storm the plowed soil would be swiped away and you would find mounds and mounds of dirt off in the distance. Kansas, Colorado, Okalahoma, and Texas were where the dusts storms were taking place. A resident of these states thought it was just a sudden hold up. But what they did not know is that this storm would last a decade. Dust was found everywhere. They would find dust in food water and creeping thought the windows at night.

Hypercholesterolemia :: Diseases, Disorders

In the simplest terms, hypercholesterolemia may be any excessive join of cholesterol in the blood. The clinical definition however, as outlined by the University of Maryland Medical Center UMMC (2010), considers a summate cholesterol level of 240 mg/dL or higher to be high cholesterol. Within this total is the level of high-density lipoproteins (HDL or good cholesterol) and low-density lipoproteins (LDL or bad cholesterol). Below 40 mg/dL is considered poor for HDL, while an optimal level of 60 mg/dL or above is more desirable. A LDL level of 160-189 mg/dL is considered high, and the optimal level is 100-129 mg/dL. In addition to LDL and HDL cholesterols, a third type of fatty material, collectively cognise as triglycerides, may be found within the blood. A triglyceride level above 200 mg/dL is high, but the desirable level is below 150mg/dL. Generally, as triglyceride levels rise, HDL cholesterol falls (UMMC, 2010).Tortora & Derrickson (2009) further illuminates the disti nction between LDL and HDL cholesterols and why these differences incur such conflicting effects in the body. LDLs convey about 75% of the total cholesterol in blood and deliver it throughout the body to cells so that they may repair cell membranes and constrain steroid hormones and bile salts (p. 991). However, when their number exceeds what is necessary, LDLs leave cholesterol in and around the smooth muscle fibers in arteries (p. 991). Thus, LDLs have earned a bad reputation. In contrast, HDLs remove excess cholesterol from body cells and blood and transport it to the liver for subsequent elimination, preventing its accumulation in the blood (p. 991). Thus, their good reputation is safe. It is important to call up though that both LDL and HDL cholesterols, as well as triglycerides, are essential in certain amounts, and LDLs and HDLs together make up the total cholesterol level used in the diagnosis of high cholesterol.According to the UMMC (2010), there are usually no sym ptoms of high cholesterol, especially in the earlier stages of the condition. The only way to diagnose an individual with high cholesterol is with a blood test, and doctors recommend that patients fast beforehand so that results only reflect operable HDL and LDL levels (How to get, 2012). Since too much cholesterol circulating within the blood can create sticky deposits called plaque along the artery walls, a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia may have very real health significance for the patient.

Analysis Of Bel Air :: essays research papers

Analysis of atomic number 5 AirIn the essay Bel Air The Automobile As Art Object Daniel L Guillory uses a combination of narrative and expository writing as a way of showing his audience the connection surrounded by an icon, which in his case is a 1958 Chevy Bel Air, and the effect that it can have on a person.Guillory starts off the essay with narrative writing. He is express his audience about how he was in Illinois when he came across a flea market. He saw a 1929 Ford Model A, but the price was in addition high for him. The farmer told him that his friend was selling a 1958 Chevy Bel Air up the road. So Guillory went and looked at the auto, and ended up buying it.By starting this essay with narrative writing he captures the readers attention, especially the readers with the same literary repertoire. This is what happened in my case. I have a plastered fascination for cars, so when I noticed it was about a car it just grabbed my attention and kept it.Guillory then goes into expository writing. He compares his 1958 Chevy Bel Air to every mans space ship, and he relates it to a space ship because the year before the car was made Sputnik was launched. He than says, Eisenhower was cover safely in the White House, Elvis was king, and the Cold War was turning icy-hot, as suggested by the Civil Defense Conelrad logo on the radio dial. fair looking at this car brought him back memories of what was happening at the time the car was made. Then he says, I dimly understood that by possessing this car I was retrieving part of my past andthrough a kind of Proustian logicexpanding my present. In order to understand the term used in this reprove you need to be familiar with the French author Marcel Proust. In his novel, Remembrance of Things Past, the narrator eats a piece of cake that takes him back to his childhood. So the term Proustian is when an object has the power to take us back to the past. I know how this experience feels. My first car was a blue 1994 Hyun dai Elantra GLS. I loved that car. I would pamper it with the best gas, the best oil and I would wash it once a week. I would go everywhere with my car.

Robert Frost Essay -- essays research papers fc

Good fences makes good neighbors, is a small portion from the Mending Wall written by one of modern times closely proficient writers, Robert Frost. Two of the amateural articles I examined were quite helpful in gaining a better understanding of the Mending Wall and also of Robert Frosts poetry. The Gale Research shows the best and most effective understanding of the Mending Wall, mainly because it deals specifically with that poem. It basically states that the poem is built around two attitudes, that of the speaker, which the Gale critic presumes is the poet, who is fanciful and an independent thinker and that of the neighbor, who prefers not to question anything (Gale). The other article deals more with other poetry that Robert Frost has written and helps explain common themes. One critic states that Frosts poetry contains a theme of nature and mankind being one entity (Wagner 12).According to the Gale Research article, the poet is describing the relationship between the two var ied men who have the same common interest in repairing the wall. It goes on explaining how they walk on each of their sides of the wall, picking up stones and replacing the oddly regulate and shattered ones. It shows the mental differences between the speaker and the neighbor by stating that the speaker, the more imaginary one, wanted to use a spell to fix the oddly do stones, while the more down to earth one wanted to use his hands and labor (Gale).&...

Dead Man Walking Essays -- essays research papers

DEAD MAN WALKING utterly Man Walking is a great book that deals with adept of our nations close controversial issues jacket crown penalization. The books narrator, babe Helen Prejean, discusses her someoneal views on capital penalty. She was a spiritual advisor and friend to deuce death row inmates Elmo retchrick Sonnier and Robert lee side Willie. From her experiences, she actual views on the death penalty. She conceptualised it was morally wrong and spoke openly round it. sister Helen successfully defends her views on capital punishment while stating that capital punishment should be illegal. Her experiences have taught her that although these criminals were dangerous and deadly, and that their crimes were inexcusable, a death sentence should not be the answer.I believe Sister Helen&8217s success in relations with the issue of capital punishment falls on the deuce cases for which she was a spiritual advisor. In these cases, Sister Helen continuously tried her best to relent remain of execution or a court appeal. She fought for what she believed in and tried her best to abolish the death penalty. Sister in no way condemned what these sea wolfs had done, besides tried her best to comfort them in their time of loneliness, sorrow, and need.Sister Helen&8217s first case, Patrick Sonnier, better influenced my opinion on capital punishment. Her strategies in dealing with a convicted killer were brave and courageous. She was always willing to meet with Patrick and to talk about anything he liked. She helped him to realize his mistake, but more importantly, helped him to become a better person. She was always reminding Pat that God had the power of forgiveness, and that if he were rattling sorry, God would forgive him. Sister Helen&8217s best arguments were the details she spoke about prior to Sonnier&8217s death. When Sister Helen spoke about Pat&8217s legal defense, it made a big impact on me as a reader. She persuaded me to look at things fro m two angles, instead of just one. As a reader, I was upset with the comparison between Pat&8217s sentence and his brother&8217s sentence. How could two brothers who conspired in the murder together receive two different sentences Pat receiving a death sentence, while Pat&8217s brother Eddie receiving a lesser fight in a ... ...sing something. Sister was missing the dreadful feeling of a loved one brutally murdered at the hands of a killer. Who is to produce that people can not change their minds about capital punishment? As of now, I am opposed to the death penalty. If someone killed a person I loved or cared about deeply, and they faced a death sentence, I would really have to consider my views again. This just shows that you should never be truly positive on your views about capital punishment until you have had the opportunity of experiencing a loss by the hands of a killer.I believe Sister Helen was extremely successful in describing her oppositions towards capital punishmen t. Her experiences as a spiritual advisor to two death row inmates gave her knowledge about capital punishment that was previously just foundation in her beliefs. Her methods of dealing with the arguments of capital punishment were honest and fair. She presented herself in a way that made you listen to everything she had to evidence about the death penalty. Her evidence and facts were thoroughly supported throughout the book. She also allowed the reader to decide on his or her own view of capital punishment. Dead Man Walking Essays -- essays research papers DEAD MAN WALKINGDead Man Walking is a great book that deals with one of our nations most controversial issues capital punishment. The books narrator, Sister Helen Prejean, discusses her personal views on capital punishment. She was a spiritual advisor and friend to two death row inmates Elmo Patrick Sonnier and Robert Lee Willie. From her experiences, she developed views on the death penalty. She believed it was morally wrong and spoke openly about it. Sister Helen successfully defends her views on capital punishment while stating that capital punishment should be illegal. Her experiences have taught her that although these criminals were dangerous and deadly, and that their crimes were inexcusable, a death sentence should not be the answer.I believe Sister Helen&8217s success in dealing with the issue of capital punishment falls on the two cases for which she was a spiritual advisor. In these cases, Sister Helen always tried her best to grant stays of execution or a court appeal. She fought for what she believed in and tried her best to abolish the death penalty. Sister in no way condemned what these killers had done, but tried her best to comfort them in their time of loneliness, sorrow, and need.Sister Helen&8217s first case, Patrick Sonnier, better influenced my opinion on capital punishment. Her strategies in dealing with a convicted killer were brave and courageous. She was always wi lling to meet with Patrick and to talk about anything he liked. She helped him to realize his mistake, but more importantly, helped him to become a better person. She was always reminding Pat that God had the power of forgiveness, and that if he were truly sorry, God would forgive him. Sister Helen&8217s best arguments were the details she spoke about prior to Sonnier&8217s death. When Sister Helen spoke about Pat&8217s legal defense, it made a big impact on me as a reader. She persuaded me to look at things from two angles, instead of just one. As a reader, I was upset with the comparison between Pat&8217s sentence and his brother&8217s sentence. How could two brothers who conspired in the murder together receive two different sentences Pat receiving a death sentence, while Pat&8217s brother Eddie receiving a lesser charge in a ... ...sing something. Sister was missing the dreadful feeling of a loved one brutally murdered at the hands of a killer. Who is to say that people can not change their minds about capital punishment? As of now, I am opposed to the death penalty. If someone killed a person I loved or cared about deeply, and they faced a death sentence, I would really have to consider my views again. This just shows that you should never be truly positive on your views about capital punishment until you have had the opportunity of experiencing a loss by the hands of a killer.I believe Sister Helen was extremely successful in describing her oppositions towards capital punishment. Her experiences as a spiritual advisor to two death row inmates gave her knowledge about capital punishment that was previously just foundation in her beliefs. Her methods of dealing with the arguments of capital punishment were honest and fair. She presented herself in a way that made you listen to everything she had to say about the death penalty. Her evidence and facts were thoroughly supported throughout the book. She also allowed the reader to decide on his or her own view of capital punishment.

Dead Man Walking Essays -- essays research papers

DEAD MAN WALKING brain dead Man Walking is a great book that deals with genius of our nations some controversial issues neat penalization. The books narrator, baby Helen Prejean, discusses her personal views on ceiling penalty. She was a spiritual advisor and friend to both death row inmates Elmo barfrick Sonnier and Robert lee Willie. From her experiences, she real views on the death penalty. She intendd it was morally wrong and spoke openly just about it. infant Helen successfully defends her views on capital punishment while stating that capital punishment should be illegal. Her experiences have taught her that although these criminals were dangerous and deadly, and that their crimes were inexcusable, a death sentence should not be the answer.I believe Sister Helen&8217s success in relations with the issue of capital punishment falls on the two cases for which she was a spiritual advisor. In these cases, Sister Helen everlastingly well-tried her best to knuckle under stay of execution or a court appeal. She fought for what she believed in and tried her best to abolish the death penalty. Sister in no way condemned what these grampuss had done, nevertheless tried her best to comfort them in their time of loneliness, sorrow, and need.Sister Helen&8217s first case, Patrick Sonnier, better influenced my opinion on capital punishment. Her strategies in dealing with a convicted killer were brave and courageous. She was always willing to meet with Patrick and to talk about anything he liked. She helped him to realize his mistake, but more importantly, helped him to become a better person. She was always reminding Pat that God had the power of forgiveness, and that if he were truly sorry, God would forgive him. Sister Helen&8217s best arguments were the details she spoke about prior to Sonnier&8217s death. When Sister Helen spoke about Pat&8217s legal defense, it made a big impact on me as a reader. She persuaded me to look at things from two angles, instead of just one. As a reader, I was upset with the comparison between Pat&8217s sentence and his brother&8217s sentence. How could two brothers who conspired in the murder together receive two different sentences Pat receiving a death sentence, while Pat&8217s brother Eddie receiving a lesser centering in a ... ...sing something. Sister was missing the dreadful feeling of a loved one brutally murdered at the hands of a killer. Who is to pronounce that people can not change their minds about capital punishment? As of now, I am opposed to the death penalty. If someone killed a person I loved or cared about deeply, and they faced a death sentence, I would really have to consider my views again. This just shows that you should never be truly positive on your views about capital punishment until you have had the opportunity of experiencing a loss by the hands of a killer.I believe Sister Helen was extremely successful in describing her oppositions towards capital punishmen t. Her experiences as a spiritual advisor to two death row inmates gave her knowledge about capital punishment that was previously just foundation in her beliefs. Her methods of dealing with the arguments of capital punishment were honest and fair. She presented herself in a way that made you listen to everything she had to set up about the death penalty. Her evidence and facts were thoroughly supported throughout the book. She also allowed the reader to decide on his or her own view of capital punishment. Dead Man Walking Essays -- essays research papers DEAD MAN WALKINGDead Man Walking is a great book that deals with one of our nations most controversial issues capital punishment. The books narrator, Sister Helen Prejean, discusses her personal views on capital punishment. She was a spiritual advisor and friend to two death row inmates Elmo Patrick Sonnier and Robert Lee Willie. From her experiences, she developed views on the death penalty. She believed it was m orally wrong and spoke openly about it. Sister Helen successfully defends her views on capital punishment while stating that capital punishment should be illegal. Her experiences have taught her that although these criminals were dangerous and deadly, and that their crimes were inexcusable, a death sentence should not be the answer.I believe Sister Helen&8217s success in dealing with the issue of capital punishment falls on the two cases for which she was a spiritual advisor. In these cases, Sister Helen always tried her best to grant stays of execution or a court appeal. She fought for what she believed in and tried her best to abolish the death penalty. Sister in no way condemned what these killers had done, but tried her best to comfort them in their time of loneliness, sorrow, and need.Sister Helen&8217s first case, Patrick Sonnier, better influenced my opinion on capital punishment. Her strategies in dealing with a convicted killer were brave and courageous. She was always will ing to meet with Patrick and to talk about anything he liked. She helped him to realize his mistake, but more importantly, helped him to become a better person. She was always reminding Pat that God had the power of forgiveness, and that if he were truly sorry, God would forgive him. Sister Helen&8217s best arguments were the details she spoke about prior to Sonnier&8217s death. When Sister Helen spoke about Pat&8217s legal defense, it made a big impact on me as a reader. She persuaded me to look at things from two angles, instead of just one. As a reader, I was upset with the comparison between Pat&8217s sentence and his brother&8217s sentence. How could two brothers who conspired in the murder together receive two different sentences Pat receiving a death sentence, while Pat&8217s brother Eddie receiving a lesser charge in a ... ...sing something. Sister was missing the dreadful feeling of a loved one brutally murdered at the hands of a killer. Who is to say that people can not c hange their minds about capital punishment? As of now, I am opposed to the death penalty. If someone killed a person I loved or cared about deeply, and they faced a death sentence, I would really have to consider my views again. This just shows that you should never be truly positive on your views about capital punishment until you have had the opportunity of experiencing a loss by the hands of a killer.I believe Sister Helen was extremely successful in describing her oppositions towards capital punishment. Her experiences as a spiritual advisor to two death row inmates gave her knowledge about capital punishment that was previously just foundation in her beliefs. Her methods of dealing with the arguments of capital punishment were honest and fair. She presented herself in a way that made you listen to everything she had to say about the death penalty. Her evidence and facts were thoroughly supported throughout the book. She also allowed the reader to decide on his or her own view o f capital punishment.